Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Toyota RAV4 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 182 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 92 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 9.8 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2009 2.5 engine: The 2.5-liter 2AR-FE engine replaced the earlier 2.4-liter AZ series and is widely regarded as a highly reliable, long-lasting engine, often referred to as a "million-kms" motor. However, it requires ... More about Toyota RAV4 2009 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 41 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 136 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`625 kg | 2`190 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |