Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Opel Mokka 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.7 Diesel | |
Petrol engines (Toyota Urban Cruiser) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Opel Mokka) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
Opel Mokka is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 40 HP less power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Opel Mokka. Due to the lower power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.1 | |
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.93 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.53 m | 1.66 m | |
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 35 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 13 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 356 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1372 litres | |
Opel Mokka has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 42 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`959 | |
Safety: | |||
Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 5200 | 8000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |