Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Nissan Juke 2014
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 20 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.9 | |
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 46 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.93 m | 4.14 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.53 m | 1.57 m | |
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 21 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 354 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1189 litres | |
Nissan Juke has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 40 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 5200 | 9800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |