Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 129 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 39 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Despite less power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 7.0 | |
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
Toyota Urban Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.93 m | 4.06 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.53 m | 1.70 m | |
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 13 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 17 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 184 litres | |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Urban Cruiser has 130 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The Suzuki Grand Vitara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`940 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 5400 | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |