Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 16 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 60 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Despite less power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 8.2 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Urban Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.70 m | |
| Toyota Urban Cruiser is 7 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 516 litres | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 130 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |