Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 227 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 79 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Despite less power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 9.7 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 5.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 765 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Urban Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 37 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 758 litres | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 84 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |