Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota Urban Cruiser) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Yeti) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 50 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 145 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 29 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Yeti scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |