Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, but torque is 30 NM more than Skoda Yeti. Despite less power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.6 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Yeti 2009 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 29 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Yeti scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |