Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 32 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, but torque is 5 NM more than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.8 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 29 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |