Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 27 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 51 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.8 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 37 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 128 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |