Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Mini Countryman 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 112 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 22 HP less power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Mini Countryman. Due to the lower power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.9 | |
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.93 m | 4.10 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.53 m | 1.56 m | |
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 17 cm shorter than the Mini Countryman, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1170 litres | |
Mini Countryman has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 36 litres less trunk space than the Mini Countryman. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | |||
Mini Countryman scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 5200 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |