Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Dacia Duster 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota Urban Cruiser) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Dacia Duster) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 107 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 17 HP less power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Dacia Duster. Despite less power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.3 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Dacia Duster 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Duster 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 39 cm shorter than the Dacia Duster, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 475 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1604 litres | |
|
Dacia Duster has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 161 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Duster. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`755 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Dacia Duster is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |