Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
Chevrolet Trax is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 50 HP less power than Chevrolet Trax, but torque is 5 NM more than Chevrolet Trax. Due to the lower power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.4 | |
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
Toyota Urban Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.93 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.53 m | 1.67 m | |
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 32 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Trax, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 15 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 356 litres | |
Chevrolet Trax has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 42 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`884 | |
Safety: | |||
Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5200 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |