Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Suzuki SX4 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 20 HP less power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Suzuki SX4. Due to the lower power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Urban Cruiser engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.3 engine Suzuki SX4 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality. High engine timing chain lifetime. Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 22 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 270 litres | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Urban Cruiser has 44 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The Suzuki SX4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |