Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Urban Cruiser engine produces 5 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Toyota Urban Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Toyota Urban Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Urban Cruiser consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Yeti engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.3 engine Skoda Yeti 2009 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 29 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Yeti scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |