Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 109 HP | 105 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 - 205 NM | 175 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 12.7 seconds | 8.4 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.0 | 6.6 | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Yeti. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 29 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`553 | ~ 2`065 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Yeti scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |