Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 109 HP | 117 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 - 205 NM | 154 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 12.7 seconds | 10 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 6.0 | 5.7 - 8.1 | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Urban Cruiser is 37 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Urban Cruiser is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Toyota Urban Cruiser has 105 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`553 | ~ 1`920 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mitsubishi ASX scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |