Toyota Tundra 2008 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 386 HP | 364 HP | |
| Torque: | 544 NM | 529 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 22 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.3 | 14.7 | |
| Toyota Tundra consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 264 mm (10.4 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 99 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 9 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 2.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`221 | 3`084 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |