Toyota Tundra 2008 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 386 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 544 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Toyota Tundra is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Tundra engine produces 250 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 230 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Thanks to more power Toyota Tundra reaches 100 km/h speed 8.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.3 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 1050 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.19 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 63 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 28 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`221 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |