Toyota Tundra 2008 vs Mazda CX-9 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 386 HP | 273 HP | |
| Torque: | 544 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 113 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 177 NM more than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.3 | 12.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Tundra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 264 mm (10.4 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 73 cm longer than the Mazda CX-9, 10 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2852 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-9, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`221 | 2`062 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |