Toyota Tundra 2008 vs Audi Q7 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Petrol engines (Toyota Tundra) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Audi Q7) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 386 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 544 NM | 550 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Toyota Tundra is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Tundra engine produces 146 HP more power than Audi Q7, but torque is 6 NM less than Audi Q7. Thanks to more power Toyota Tundra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.3 | 9.1 | |
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 6.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 930 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 100 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 264 mm (10.4 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.81 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 2.03 m | 1.98 m | |
Height: | 1.94 m | 1.74 m | |
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 72 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 20 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 775 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 1.4 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`221 | 3`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 21 000 | 14 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |