Toyota Tundra 2008 vs Audi Q7 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 386 HP | 233 HP | |
Torque: | 544 NM | 500 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
Toyota Tundra is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Tundra engine produces 153 HP more power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Audi Q7. Thanks to more power Toyota Tundra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.3 | 10.5 | |
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 720 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 100 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.81 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 2.03 m | 1.98 m | |
Height: | 1.94 m | 1.74 m | |
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 72 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 20 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 775 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 775 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 1.4 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`221 | 2`990 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 20 400 | 7000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |