Toyota Tundra 2013 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 543 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 201 HP more power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 143 NM more than Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.7 | 7.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 7.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 1170 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 120 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 56 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 600 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |