Toyota Tundra 2013 vs Ford Ranger 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 543 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 231 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 168 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.7 | 9.4 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 6.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 945 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 120 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 46 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 18 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 200 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |