Toyota Tundra 2013 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 543 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 150 HP more power than Nissan Navara, but torque is 7 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.7 | 9.5 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 6.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 930 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 120 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.40 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 42 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 18 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.9 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 1.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 200 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |