Toyota Tundra 2013 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota Tundra) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan Navara) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 543 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 191 HP more power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.7 | 8.3 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 7.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 1110 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 120 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 840'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Tundra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 28 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Tundra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 59 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 18 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.9 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 1.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 2`805 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 800 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |