Toyota Tundra 2013 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota Tundra) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Ranger) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 543 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 181 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.7 | 8.5 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 7.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 1080 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 120 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 45 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 17 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 200 | 31 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |