Toyota Tundra 2013 vs Dodge Durango 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 543 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 87 HP more power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 190 NM more than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.7 | 11.2 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 675 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 120 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 254 mm (10 inches) | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Toyota Tundra version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Toyota Tundra 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 840'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Tundra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 70 cm longer than the Dodge Durango, 11 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.9 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 2.4 metres more than that of the Dodge Durango, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 800 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |