Toyota Tundra 2013 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 355 HP | |
| Torque: | 543 NM | 519 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 26 HP more power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.7 | 11.9 | |
|
The Chevrolet Tahoe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 120 litres | 98 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Tahoe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 254 mm (10 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Toyota Tundra version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Toyota Tundra 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.04 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.89 m | |
| Toyota Tundra is 63 cm longer than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 433 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 433 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2681 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 3 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`175 kg | 3`220 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`495 kg | 2`479 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 680 kg | 741 kg | |
| Toyota Tundra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Chevrolet Tahoe. Therefore, Chevrolet Tahoe is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 600 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |