Toyota Tundra 2013 vs Audi Q7 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 381 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 543 NM | 550 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Toyota Tundra engine produces 141 HP more power than Audi Q7, but torque is 7 NM less than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.7 | 9.1 | |
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 6.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 990 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 120 litres | 100 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 254 mm (10 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Toyota Tundra version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Toyota Tundra 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.81 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 2.03 m | 1.98 m | |
Height: | 1.93 m | 1.74 m | |
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 73 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 19 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 775 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 14.9 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 2.9 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 3`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 34 200 | 15 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |