Toyota Tundra 2009 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 361 NM | 347 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 50 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 14 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 10.4 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 259 mm (10.2 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Toyota Tundra version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Toyota Tundra 2009 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 98 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 9 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 2`812 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |