Toyota Tundra 2010 vs Toyota Tundra 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 381 HP | 381 HP | |
Torque: | 544 NM | 543 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Toyota Tundra 2010 and Toyota Tundra 2013 have the same engine power, but Toyota Tundra 2010 torque is 1 NM more than Toyota Tundra 2013. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.4 | 15.7 | |
The Toyota Tundra 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra 2010 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Tundra 2013, which means that by driving the Toyota Tundra 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 120 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Toyota Tundra 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 259 mm (10.2 inches) | 254 mm (10 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.81 m | 5.81 m | |
Width: | 2.03 m | 2.03 m | |
Height: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Tundra 2010 and Toyota Tundra 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 14.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra 2010 is 1.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Tundra 2013, which means Toyota Tundra 2010 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`130 | 3`175 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 20 400 | 34 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Toyota Tundra has
| |