Toyota Tundra 2010 vs Ford F150 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 544 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 71 HP more power than Ford F150, whereas torque is 179 NM more than Ford F150. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.4 | 13.7 | |
| Toyota Tundra consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 98 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.89 m | |
| Toyota Tundra is 8 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1855 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`130 | 3`221 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Ford F150 has
| |