Toyota Tundra 2008 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.7 (petrol) | 3.0 - 6.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Jeep Grand Cherokee is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 - 386 HP | 247 - 468 HP | |
| Torque: | 361 - 544 NM | 347 - 624 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 - 15.3 | 7.5 - 14.7 | |
|
Toyota Tundra petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 259 - 264 mm (10.2 - 10.4 inches) | 211 - 218 mm (8.3 - 8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 98 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 8 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1554 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`085 kg | ~ 2`948 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`338 kg | ~ 2`281 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 747 kg | ~ 667 kg | |
| Toyota Tundra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Therefore, Toyota Tundra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |