Toyota Tundra 2008 vs Ford F150 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.7 | 3.5 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 - 386 HP | 248 - 411 HP | |
| Torque: | 361 - 544 NM | 294 - 588 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 - 15.3 | 12.4 - 15.7 | |
|
Toyota Tundra petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford F150. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.91 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Tundra is 8 cm shorter than the Ford F150, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Tundra is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1855 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.6 meters | 14.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford F150, which means Toyota Tundra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`085 | ~ 3`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Ford F150 has
| |