Toyota Tacoma 2024 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Hybrid | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Toyota Tacoma) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Mitsubishi L 200), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 278 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Tacoma engine produces 77 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 40 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 15.80 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 292 mm (11.5 inches) | 228 mm (9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tacoma can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.41 m | 5.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Toyota Tacoma is larger. Toyota Tacoma is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 11 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tacoma is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.2 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tacoma is 1.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Toyota Tacoma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`023 kg | 3`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`282 kg | 2`020 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 741 kg | 980 kg | |
| Toyota Tacoma load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 32 procentiem less than Mitsubishi L 200. Therefore, Mitsubishi L 200 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tacoma has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |