Toyota Tacoma 2015 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 278 HP | 284 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 352 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Tacoma engine produces 6 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, but torque is 8 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 10.7 | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tacoma consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tacoma could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 239 mm (9.4 inches) | 178 mm (7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tacoma can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Tacoma engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus RX, Lexus IS, Lexus GS | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Tacoma might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Tacoma engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.39 m | 5.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Tacoma is 35 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Tacoma is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2251 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`540 kg | 2`717 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`032 kg | 2`011 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 508 kg | 706 kg | |
| Toyota Tacoma load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 39 procentiem less than Nissan Pathfinder. Therefore, Nissan Pathfinder is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tacoma has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |