Toyota Tacoma 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 278 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Tacoma engine produces 47 HP more power than Nissan Navara, but torque is 190 NM less than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 9.5 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tacoma consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tacoma could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 79 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus RX, Lexus IS, Lexus GS | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.39 m | 5.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Toyota Tacoma and Nissan Navara are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tacoma has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |