Toyota Tacoma 2023 vs Ford Ranger 2022
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Tacoma is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Ranger can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota Tacoma also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 (petrol, hybrid) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. Ford Ranger is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 228 - 278 HP | 170 - 292 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 - 430 NM | 405 - 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 - 12.1 seconds | |
| In general, Ford Ranger are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Tacoma. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 11.8 | 3.2 - 13.8 | |
|
Toyota Tacoma petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 279 - 292 mm (11 - 11.5 inches) | 226 - 266 mm (8.9 - 10.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tacoma can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.41 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Tacoma is 5 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.2 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tacoma is 1.2 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Toyota Tacoma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`707 kg | ~ 3`276 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`042 kg | ~ 2`434 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 665 kg | ~ 842 kg | |
| Toyota Tacoma load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 41 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tacoma has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |