Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 101 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Starlet is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Starlet engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Starlet consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Toyota Starlet over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Starlet consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Toyota Starlet and Volkswagen Polo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 975 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |