Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Toyota Starlet 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 101 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Toyota Starlet 1990 and Toyota Starlet 1996 have the same engine power, but Toyota Starlet 1990 torque is 14 NM less than Toyota Starlet 1996. Toyota Starlet 1990 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Starlet 1990 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet 1996, which means that by driving the Toyota Starlet 1990 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Starlet 1990 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet 1996. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet 1990 is smaller. Toyota Starlet 1990 is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Starlet 1996, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet 1990 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet 1990 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Starlet 1996, which means Toyota Starlet 1990 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
| |