Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Toyota Starlet 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota Starlet 1990) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Starlet 1996) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 91 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Starlet 1996 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Starlet 1990 engine produces 21 HP less power than Toyota Starlet 1996, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Toyota Starlet 1996. Due to the lower power, Toyota Starlet 1990 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Starlet 1990 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Starlet 1990 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet 1996, which means that by driving the Toyota Starlet 1990 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Starlet 1990 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet 1996. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Starlet 1990 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet 1990 is smaller. Toyota Starlet 1990 is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Starlet 1996, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet 1990 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet 1990 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Starlet 1996, which means Toyota Starlet 1990 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |