Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Honda Jazz 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota Starlet) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda Jazz) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 91 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Starlet engine produces 29 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Starlet is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Starlet consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Toyota Starlet over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Starlet consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Starlet gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller. Toyota Starlet is 11 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1323 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`470 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Starlet has serious deffects in 360 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |