Toyota Starlet 1991 vs Honda Jazz 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 83 HP | |
Torque: | 101 NM | 119 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Starlet engine produces 8 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.8 | |
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Starlet consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Starlet could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
Honda Jazz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.72 m | 3.83 m | |
Width: | 1.60 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.52 m | |
Toyota Starlet is smaller. Toyota Starlet is 11 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 13 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1323 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`470 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | high | |
Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Starlet has serious deffects in 360 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |