Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 101 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Starlet is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Starlet engine produces 4 HP more power than Seat Toledo, but torque is 23 NM less than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.4 | |
|
The Toyota Starlet is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Starlet consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Toyota Starlet over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller. Toyota Starlet is 60 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 1.5 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Toyota Starlet has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Toyota Starlet, so Toyota Starlet quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |