Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Honda Jazz 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 103 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Starlet engine produces 8 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.8 | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Starlet consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Starlet could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda Jazz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller. Toyota Starlet is 11 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1323 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`470 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |