Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Toyota Starlet 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 103 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
| Toyota Starlet 1996 and Toyota Starlet 1990 have the same engine power, but Toyota Starlet 1996 torque is 12 NM more than Toyota Starlet 1990. Toyota Starlet 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.0 | |
|
The Toyota Starlet 1990 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Starlet 1996 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet 1990, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Starlet 1996 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet 1996 is larger. Toyota Starlet 1996 is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Starlet 1990, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Starlet 1996 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet 1996 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Starlet 1990, which means Toyota Starlet 1996 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |