Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Starlet engine produces 19 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Despite less power, Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Starlet consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Starlet could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Starlet consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller. Toyota Starlet is 11 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 204 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |