Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Nissan Note 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Toyota Starlet engine produces 13 HP less power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Nissan Note. Despite less power, Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Starlet consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Starlet could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller. Toyota Starlet is 34 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1332 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 1.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`546 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Nissan Note has
| |