Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Starlet engine produces 11 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.1 | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Starlet consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Starlet could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller. Toyota Starlet is 58 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 308 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1218 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Starlet has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Corolla has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Toyota Starlet, so Toyota Starlet quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |